Journal of law and courts If you’re working on new law and courts research, navigate to Data and Resources or Publications for useful research links, including datasets, articles from the Journal of Law and Courts, book reviews from the Law and Politics Book Review, and the Law and Courts Newsletter. We are grateful to a large number of commentators in both China and the United States whose feedback helped improve this article and to the many research assistants at Berkeley, Columbia, and the University of California, San Diego, who worked on various stages of this project. We thank Jack Beermann, Frank Easterbrook, Einer Elhauge, William Eskridge, David Klein, Gary Lawson, Richard Posner, Stephen Williams, and three anonymous reviewers, as well as workshop participants at the University of Chicago, Boston University, and the University of California, Irvine, for helpful comments. 17. The journal is dedicated to combating intellectual fragmentation and promoting communication and fertilization across traditional boundaries by tackling theoretical and empirical questions that Know all about Journal of Law and Courts - Impact factor, Acceptance rate, Scite Analysis, H-index, SNIP Score, ISSN, Citescore, SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR), Aims & Scope, Publisher, and Other Important Metrics. To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge. org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. But the factors that determine whether the judiciary ends up playing such a role are not well understood. Scores of theoretical models are based on the premise that incumbents who meddle with the institutional framework of legitimate judiciaries should expect to face electoral costs (e. While studies applying the second-order evaluations approach have overwhelmingly focused on EU institutions, here we seek to determine whether second-order evaluations are also characteristic Oct 21, 2022 · We are grateful to Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. This journal is published by the University of Chicago Press. The latest impact score (IS) of the Journal of Law and Courts is 1. 709. North Carolina’s institutional changes in Bill 41. ” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2): 291 –312. Judicial–legislative dynamics in separation of powers. , Vanberg Reference Vanberg 2000, Reference Vanberg 2001; Stephenson Oct 21, 2022 · Though the Supreme Court’s word is final, barring a constitutional amendment or legislative override in nonconstitutional cases, the mechanism of criticism in the circuits allows reconsideration of many issues already decided by the Court and sheds light on the importance of institutional structures to the maintenance of the rule of law. The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is an interdisciplinary journal for members of Mar 4, 2024 · Found. ” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42 : 211 –33. To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge. Apr 25, 2023 · Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association Access options Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. The Supreme Court’s Aguilar-Spinelli test was a rule, and its Illinois v. Clark. Meanwhile, state courts play an important role in the development of law at the Supreme Court. Justices employ numerous strategies to obtain lower court deference to their decisions, including the provocative practice of relying upon foreign law. The electoral risks of court-packing. Oct 21, 2022 · Why Do Courts Delay? - Volume 5 Issue 2. The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is an interdisciplinary journal for members of the law and courts intellectual community. Journal of Law and Courts - Tom S. Opinion writing is central to judicial decision-making. Abbreviation: J LAW COURTS ISSN: 2164-6570 eISSN: 2164-6589 Category: LAW - ESCI. Rachlinksi, and Andrew J. Journal of Law and Court Courts like the U. The ISSN of this journal is 21646589, 21646570. How a law shapes public life after enactment is frequently the result of whether the judiciary interprets the provisions contained in a law and how courts reconcile provisions within and across laws. It has an ISSN identifier of 2164-6570. . ” The legal doctrine we evaluate concerns police searches based upon information supplied by confidential informants. Database Coverage . Replication materials for this article are available at the Journal of Law and Courts’ Dataverse archive. We would like to thank Lisa Hilbink, Alex Hunneus, Kathryn Hendley, Maria Popova, Andreas Schedler, Kim Scheppele, Mihaela Serban, Peter Solomon, Alexander Stroh, and Peter VonDoepp for their helpful comments on the earlier draft of this article. Oct 21, 2022 · Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution - Volume 2 Issue 1. Arising out of a separation of powers framework, judicial independence is a fundamental consideration in determining, first, whether judges are free to decide cases according to their sincere beliefs or evaluations of the law – without fear of punishment or retribution. Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ISSN 2164-6570 EISSN 2164-6589. We argue that this approach is more appropriate for understanding international courts than is the legitimacy approach of the law and courts literature. The Justice System Journal is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original research articles on all aspects of law, courts, court administration, judicial behavior, and the impact of all of these on public and social policy. S. Debates over prison privatization neglect to consider differences in legal access across private and public prisons. Footnotes 1 The four exceptions are Illinois, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Virginia (Berry and Lisk Reference Berry and Lisk 2017 ). Redirecting to /core/journals/journal-of-law-and-courts/article/abs/justice-isnt-blind-attorney-attractiveness-and-success-in-us-federal-court The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is the flagship journal of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association. Despite wide acceptance that briefs are important, empirical scholarship has yet to establish their influence on the Supreme Court or fully explore justices’ preferences regarding them. The assumption may hold for the US Supreme Court, where all law clerks are relatively inexperienced. ” Chinese Journal of International Law 5 ( 2 ): 301 –22. The metrics below are produced by third parties as ways to quantify the impact this journal has on the research community. Here and in all the issues to follow, we hope you will find article after article that broadens your knowledge, deepens your understanding, and raises exciting new questions as to law and legal actors across a vast geographic, temporal, and theoretical range. Hazelton and Hinkle note in their recent work that, “[i]t is the majority opinions, not outcomes, that lower courts and government officials interpret and implement” (Reference Hazelton and Hinkle 2022, 157). The journal is dedicated to combating intellectual fragmentation and promoting communication and fertilization across traditional boundaries by tackling theoretical and empirical questions that strike a wide audience of If you’re working on new law and courts research, navigate to Data and Resources or Publications for useful research links, including datasets, articles from the Journal of Law and Courts, book reviews from the Law and Politics Book Review, and the Law and Courts Newsletter. We thank Chuck Cameron, Cliff Carrubba, Mike Giles, Adam Glynn, Lewis Kornhauser, Jon Nash, Jeff Staton, Tom Walker, and seminar participants at Emory University, Princeton University, Yale University, the University of Georgia, and the Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse for helpful comments and discussions. » Journal of Law and Courts. Oct 21, 2022 · We use a quasi-experimental design with the Court decisions as the stimulus of hypothesized public awareness change. Judges and Their Allies - Volume 2 Issue 1. Jan 29, 2024 · Constraining judicial decision-making with court-curbing legislation. CrossRef Google Scholar Jan 4, 2024 · The Journal of Law & Courts is soliciting submissions for a special issue focused on international and comparative law and courts. CrossRef Google Scholar. ” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1): 139 –92. g. “ Some (Potential) Applications of Computer Content Analysis to the Study of Law and Courts. Read the latest issue. Initial descriptive studies on the effect of court-curbing legislation on judicial behavior sought to determine whether the Supreme Court deferred to congressional preferences – or engaged in sophisticated decision-making – after the bills were introduced to avoid the proposed changes to the structure and function of the “ The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice. It has broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, involving theory and relevant data and progressive policy of cross-cultural interest. Journal-level metrics. Oct 21, 2022 · ” Journal of Law and Courts 3: 331 –67. The special issue will welcome a broad range of topics, but we are especially interested in papers that are connected to regime transition, democratic backsliding, judicial and institutional reform, accountability Results show that the potential for lower court influence differs for appointed versus elected state court judges, lending valuable insight into the discussion of judicial power and institutional design. ” Law and Courts: Newsletter of the Law and Courts Section of the American Political Science Association 22 ( 1 ): 26 – 32 . Oct 21, 2022 · Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions - Volume 8 Issue 2. Results show that the potential for lower court influence differs for appointed versus elected state court judges, lending valuable insight into the discussion of judicial power and institutional design. “State Courts and Policy Legitimation: An Experimental Study of the Ability of State Courts to Change Opinion. Slotnick, Elliot, Sara Schiavoni, and Sheldon Goldman. We thank law and courts panels at the Southern, Midwest, and American Political Science Association (APSA) annual meetings for helpful feedback on earlier iterations of this article, particularly discussants Terri Peretti, Jeff Segal, and Amy Steigerwalt and audience members Joshua Fischman and David Hughes. North, Douglass, and Barry Weingast. To understand these complex and often-lengthy documents, scholars frequently rely on dichotomous indicators of opinion content. The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is an interdisciplinary journal for members of Law without the State - Volume 1 Issue 1. It is computed in the year 2023 as per its definition and based on Scopus data. Journal of Law and Courts is an academic journal published by University of Chicago Press. Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies, the Journal of Law and Society presents an interdisciplinary approach. Research Article. 2014. 2016. This study examines judicial responsiveness among North Carolina’s Superior Court judges—the state’s main trial court with jurisdiction over felony cases, civil cases involving more than $10,000, and misdemeanor cases appealed from North Carolina’s District Courts. Posner, Nancy Staudt, Eugene Volokh, Ed Whelan, and the anonymous reviewers for useful insights; to When Judging Is Power - Volume 3 Issue 1. I would like to thank David Klein, the three anonymous reviewers, Julie Allard, Laura Hilly, Noémie Goldman, Yseult Marique, Simona Lastrego, Benoit Remiche, Nicole Dewandres, Robert Salvesen, Laura Van den Eynde, as well as the participants in a panel at the 2013 annual meeting of the Law and Society Association and at the International Symposium Dec 13, 2022 · Both the appellate and district courts are responsive to Supreme Court precedent, but district courts are not equally responsive to liberal and conservative updates to doctrine. WoS Core Citation Indexes: The study challenges the assumption that delegation of drafting duties to law clerks automatically results in judgments with a less confident writing style, due to the clerks’ inexperience. The dominant research topics disseminated in this journal consist of Law, Supreme court, Politics, Public administration and Law and economics. Enns, Peter K. Further, as the Supreme Court ideology changes from the time of setting precedent, appellate courts are less likely to cite the precedent, but district courts cite it more. Oct 21, 2022 · Policy Preferences and Legal Interpretation - Volume 1 Issue 1. Please note that these metrics should always be considered in the context of how they are calculated. I argue that private prisons experience lower filing rates than public prisons, and that cases brought against publicly traded private prison companies are less likely to be dismissed and more likely to succeed than similar cases against public prisons. Welcome to the very first issue of the Journal of Law and Courts. The Journal Of Law And Courts is a research journal that publishes research related to Social Sciences. By contrast, lower courts typically hear multiple cases a day and often reach some decision in each of them immediately (Abraham Reference Abraham 1998 ), but hearing-level data from Oct 21, 2022 · This paper evaluates the impact of a higher court articulating doctrine as either a “rule” or a “standard. Pettys, Richard A. 48% compared to the preceding year 2021, indicating a rising trend. Sep 4, 2023 · Doctrinal development and the importance of judicial opinions. 1. Scopus; Scilit; ESCI; Journal Articles. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Supreme court & Politics. 17 It is increased by a factor of around 0. We find that public awareness of cases varies according to individual differences: more educated, knowledgeable, and informationally motivated citizens are more likely to report awareness. Journal of Law and Courts. Journal of Law and Courts offers a venue for the publication of innovative research findings in the quickly growing areas of Law. Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Open access Access CompLaw: A Coding Protocol and Database for the Comparative Study of Judicial Review. Based on the Scopus data, the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) of journal of law and courts is 0. 1989. 189 articles in Journal of Law and Courts. Wistrich, whose experiments inspired us to write this article; to Gad Barzilai, Rebecca Brown, John Drobak, David Klein, Micheal Giles, Linda Greenhouse, Anna Harvey, Leonie Huddy, Adam Liptak, Todd E. We appreciate funding, financial, and other support from the Australian Research Council (LP0210306, LP0669168, DP0665198, DP1096888, DP150103663), Flinders University, and the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration, the Association of Australian Magistrates, and many courts and their judicial officers. CrossRef Google Scholar The legal brief is a primary vehicle by which lawyers seek to persuade appellate judges. The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is the flagship journal of the Law & Courts Section of the American Political Science Association. The Journal of Law and Courts (JLC) is an interdisciplinary journal for members of the law and courts intellectual community. 3, and the percentage change is 34. JLC publishes articles tackling theoretical and empirical questions that strike a wide audience of scholars as important across legal and judicial issues relating to politics, process, policy, ethics, justice, and/or culture. The opinions of the US Supreme Court are central to volumes of research on law, courts, and politics. Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals generally hear few cases per day and have considerable time to deliberate before rendering a decision. Existing scholarship suggests that the public might protect courts against court-packing attempts. In addition to political science scholarship, the journal has interdisciplinary aims and publishes a broad range of research for members of the law and courts intellectual community. Supreme Court influence depends greatly on the responses of lower court judges to its precedent. bjxvnqti ggir icudxm cseujxm ztoagw zrir beczxc lqszweqh sets cht